Linked by Howard Fosdick on Sat 24th Nov 2012 17:52 UTC
Permalink for comment 543228
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-18
Really? .net apps sure beats Java apps at least. Then again, gouging your eyes out with a spork beats using Java apps on the desktop.
Sure, and you could do the same in asm if you wanted but that's not the point.
Sure, you could do it with Perl CGI's too.
True that
Better is a relative term. it's not necessarily "better" if I have to spend a lot of money and time porting existing apps to it.
It's not 2001 anymore, IIS isn't horribly vulnerable these days.