Linked by Howard Fosdick on Wed 28th Nov 2012 01:24 UTC
Permalink for comment 543365
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-05-03
I still have an old machine running XP. I'm not so concerned about the de-support as I am about running anti-malware on it. It's a uniprocessor P-4 that just doesn't have the horsepower to run most current anti-malware efficiently. Adaware and Avast! are examples. The thing can't run them with sufficient speed to make them practical.
Any ideas for other antimalware I can use (that has real-time support?)
I can run Malwarebytes and Clamwin but these do not have real-time support.