Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 28th Nov 2012 15:17 UTC
Permalink for comment 543400
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-12-05
But how many of those "licenses" were actually bought for upgrading or installing on an previous machine?
Microsoft needs to differentiate "full/upgrade" installs from PCs that come loaded with the latest OEM version of Windows with no other choice. Until then, their numbers are meaningless, as always. Obviously all the OEMs are going to go out and buy millions upon millions of licenses of the latest Windows to stick on their machines and call it a feature and claim that their system is fully up to date, but what about normal Windows users--the end user, not the middleman?