Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 28th Nov 2012 15:17 UTC
Permalink for comment 543444
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-08-18
It depends, Windows XP runs like a dog on Dual Core machines. Vista, 7 and 8 run much better. 8 is miles faster than 7.
Speed wise Windows 8 > 7 > Vista.
The main problem is RAM, because of the aggressive pre-fetching, however it does scale itself back properly.
I personally don't find it a problem.
I agree. I am using 8 and I just use the classic part for most things. I like the Metro Apps but I just don't really use them except for mail and skype.
I would have liked an Arm powered laptop with 8 that was running VS ... could have been an awesome machine.
Edited 2012-11-28 20:36 UTC