Linked by Howard Fosdick on Wed 28th Nov 2012 01:24 UTC
Permalink for comment 543505
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-29
Manipulated numbers?
Are you kidding? They have not changed the ways numbers are reported from Windows Vista and Windows 7.
You know Microsoft is a publicly traded company, so manipulation on the scale that you're implying is illegal. It is telling that you'd suggest that there is foul play at hand. It can't possibly be that, you know, Windows 8 is the disaster that OSNews armchair CEOs predicted it would be.
Is Windows 7's marketshare manipulated numbers too? Because that's the consequence of Windows 7's licensing sales (which are reported in the same manner Windows 8's are)