Linked by BloopFloop on Fri 30th Nov 2012 10:35 UTC
Permalink for comment 543673
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Ultimately, OS/2 wasn't about the goals of its potential users and such - it was about returning to IBM the control over the PC market. So of course we didn't go for it, and already numerous PC OEMs rebelled, Gang of Nine style - and chose a relatively friendler option of Win 3.x when it showed up.
Still, quite entertaining little read about earlier days of OS/2.
PS. Part two is already there http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/11/26/os2_final_fail/
Edited 2012-11-30 11:12 UTC