Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 30th Nov 2012 11:55 UTC
Permalink for comment 543704
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-01-11
Although I believe more frequent releases from Microsoft is a good thing, I don't think this counts as rolling releases.
There's a very simple way to test if something has a rolling release development: if it has a version number then it's not rolling release. For example:
What version of Windows are you using? (example: Windows 7)
What version of Mac OS X are you using? (example: 10.6)
What version of Arch Linux are you using? (example: Right now)
What version of Gentoo Linux are you using? (example: Last Tuesday?)
Rolling release software has no support for "older versions" because there are no older versions. The only version is "now". I assume this won't be the case with Microsoft, whether you're running Windows 9 or Windows 2018.