Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 28th Nov 2012 15:17 UTC
Permalink for comment 543804
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Well, I would point out that Statcounter likely focuses on & reflects more the EN/international sites. You can certainly see some differences with ranking.pl, my local stats:
http://gs.statcounter.com/#os-PL-monthly-200807-201212
http://ranking.pl/en/rankings/operating-systems.html
The direction of the differences even kinda makes sense, WRT Statcounter & EN/international sites hypothesis - people from PL who visit them are expected to be somewhat more EN-capable, tech-savvy, or wealthy; hence more likely to use Win7 or OSX.
Much clearer differences for browsers in Belarus:
http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser-BY-monthly-200807-201212
http://www.ranking.by/en/rankings/web-browsers-groups.html
or Ukraine:
http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser-UA-monthly-200807-201212
http://www.ranking.com.ua/en/rankings/web-browsers-groups.html
Of course, that doesn't really say which of those two are more reliable - but does point to some inherent overall unreliability in both of them.