Linked by snydeq on Mon 3rd Dec 2012 14:57 UTC
Permalink for comment 544228
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-08-18
Which is exactly what I did back in 2006, around the time Vista was released (hint: not a coincidence). But the customization wasn't really one of the main reasons for switching.
Oh goody for you. Unless you had ultra compelling reason to switch (you don't) ... please don't waste my time pretending to know how the latest Windows works.
I only said that the Start screen was specifically designed and optimized for touchscreens, not that it doesn't work at all without them. There is a difference.
So lets get this right. I just said something that invalidated your opinion on the subject because your statement is an opinion.
The Start screen clearly works because you can use it is. If you want to discuss usability studies that is a different subject entirely.
Edited 2012-12-04 23:05 UTC