Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 4th Dec 2012 23:01 UTC
Permalink for comment 544344
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-06-08
If they'd push for glibc base underneath (and related drivers) I'd say yes. But they took a shortcut and use bionic (Android's libc) and Android lower stack in order to benefit from the existing hardware base. So the outcome is not giving any advantages for the rest of the Linux world.
Jolla's benefit on the other hand (or anyone's who pushes regular Linux) for the community, is paving a path for any other distro with providing hardware where those distros can run. Be it Nemo Mobile, Plasma Active or etc. Firefox OS won't help with that.
Edited 2012-12-05 23:51 UTC