Linked by Howard Fosdick on Thu 6th Dec 2012 05:26 UTC
Permalink for comment 544404
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-01-28
Z_God,
As I recall, the secure boot specs specifically block flash updates which are unsigned by a secure boot key. So unless you find an exploit or can disable secure boot, you cannot flash away secure boot.
I am so thankful that, amid all the criticism, MS found it in their heart to force windows 8 machines to add a user accessible override for secure boot on x86. There was probably an internal fight at MS between lawyers worried about antitrust lawsuits and business suits wanting all computers to be locked down. It sucks that ARM computer users are still being shafted and that owner control still isn't in the UEFI spec, but at least x86 users have a way to take control back.