Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 10th Dec 2012 23:24 UTC
Permalink for comment 544712
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/14/13 18:22 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-15
Being innovative does not automatically mean high quality or fun to play. Yes, Brain sucks. World of Goo, too, along with SMB, Binding of Isaac, Ludum Dare, FEZ and so on. I just do not find any of those games interesting or able to keep me entertained, and I really hate the trend among Indie-devs where they just ride with cutesy, cartoony graphics or "pixelated" graphics in an effort to look edgy. I don't want innovative or edgy as the only selling point.
Looking through my collection I have only a couple Indie-games that I like: The Witcher, Amnesia: The Dark Descent, Deponia 1&2 and The Whispered World. One thing that all these games have in common is the fact that the story itself is the main selling point.