Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 10th Dec 2012 23:24 UTC
Permalink for comment 544769
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-07-07
True, but what Valve is able to offer is the ability ot buy your games once and have them on whatever platforms Steam is available on, if their console does in fact run on bog standard x86_64 hardware with a more or less standard Linux dristro and a locked UEFI system then whats the problem to Linux uses if Valve also releases a Steam client for Linux? The games ported to the steamBox would play without modification, the SteamBox's UEFI would basically only be there for them to appease the MPAA if they wanted to offer things like Netflix.
By doing this Valve basically gets to kill 3 birds with one stone.Get the console gamers on board, get the Linux gaming market, all of it that has been forcing Steam to work in Wine for all these years as well as possibly more games ported to OS X since the leap from Linux to OS X is allot shorter then the leap from Windows to anything else.
All they have to do in convince a few publishers to release games on their platform, which in the case of Windows gaming makes them the 800Lb gorilla in the room. Microsoft doesn't have allot to stand on since if you look up "Games For Windows" it is universally reviled.