Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 12th Dec 2012 19:37 UTC
Permalink for comment 545065
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-05-19
Indeed, every version of NT has been released for at least two architectures.
My guess is that Microsoft has a group specifically to maintain a non-x86 build of NT. By doing this, they make sure that platform dependency does not creep in, and that NT remains portable.
--
NT 3.1 and 3.5 were available on x86, MIPS, and PowerpC.
NT 3.51 was available on x86, Alpha, MIPS, and PowerpC.
Windows NT 4.0 was released for x86 and Alpha.
NT 5.0 (Windows 2000) was released on x86 only. (The Alpha build made it all the way into the first Release Candidate, before being killed off.) A year later, though, Microsoft released an Itanium port of Windows 2000.
Itanium was maintained in Windows NT 5.1 (XP / Server 2003), NT 6.0 (Vista / Server 2008), and NT 6.1 (7 / Server 2008 R2). By the end, Itanium was clearly dead -- there were more servers running PowerPC and SPARC than Itanium!
For NT 6.2 (8 / Server 2013), Itanium was finally dropped. Not to worry, ARM came in to replace Itanium.