Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 12th Dec 2012 22:03 UTC
Permalink for comment 545103
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-25
I don't need to trust it - I've seen the source code... And yes, it does exactly what I think it does.
Yes it does - because people want it. If you give away a product that doesn't do what people want no one will use it... Yes, Google walks a tightrope balancing out what is best for them short term (data collection) and what is best for them long term (not pissing off users) - but in general they seem to do a pretty good job imo.
What doesn't make sense is your conspiracy theory. Its ridiculous and has no basis in reality... In short because there is nothing about this feature that would elicit the result you imply - it has no material effect on tracking users. If you didn't want to be tracked before, you would either use incognito mode or just disble/clear your cookies - you would still have to do the same thing now.
Fair enough, but I don't see what that has to do with this particular feature. It has absolutely nothing to do with advertising...