Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 14th Dec 2012 11:51 UTC
Permalink for comment 545330
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-06-08
Apple isn't much better. They also don't like open standards, and use them only when they have no control over the situation. Look at their opposition to open video codecs and you'll see it clearly.
But not every corporation is so low on business ethics, as to use crooked standards for lock in. Many are decent and favor interoperability and open standards.
Aiming for profit and being ethical are not contradicting interests. Contrary to what MS or Apple try to convince everyone around.
Edited 2012-12-15 22:44 UTC