Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 15th Dec 2012 19:11 UTC
Permalink for comment 545359
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-18
"They would not have gotten as far if they had used the pregnant teenager who did the same before her.
As I can recall, the argument wasn't that Rosa Parks, and she alone, should be excluded from the segregation laws. There was no "lets exclude this one person as a first step" argument.
Really, I understand your point but this is just not a good comparison. "
It's actually a very good comparison, because no one is arguing that Alan Turing and Alan Turing alone should receive a pardon. No, that is the fantasy dreamt up by all the naysayers.