Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 17th Dec 2012 11:24 UTC
Permalink for comment 545519
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-10-12
Interesting article and I would agree with it however not in this scenario. It's true that Microsoft has services that could replace Google sufficiently for most of its users.
However, in this case they were the ones that joined the market late and they need to catch up to their competitors. This means they need to lure customers away from Apple or Android and I'm not sure if that is feasible without Google services which are available on both their competitors' platforms.
Edited 2012-12-17 13:22 UTC