Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 18th Dec 2012 14:31 UTC
Permalink for comment 545688
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-08-22
Well, it was expected that Judge Koh would deny Samsung's request for new trial, etc - mostly because she denies between 66% and 90% of what they request, and grant Apple's requests in about same proportions. So nothing unexpected.
That said, it is highly unlikely that it would stand on appeal - e.g. she's very likely to be overruled - especially when the sum of all her orders are reviewed, which I think would reveal at least a little bias towards Apple.
So it just helps clear the way for appeal.
Hopefully, she'll step aside when the appeals court sends it back for another trial.