Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 18th Dec 2012 14:31 UTC
Permalink for comment 545808
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-10-12
Errr, the whole the foundation and the logic behind a jury system has everything to do with democratic procedures aiming towards a just outcome.
However, the implementation is certainly archaic especially when it comes to IP law which has become very complex. The average person is not fit for such proceedings as they have little time to get around ideas that people spent an entire college degree learning.
A jury of individuals specialised on the matter at hand might sound reasonable but the problem there is that you're very likely to run into conflict of interest issues.