Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 17th Dec 2012 22:59 UTC
Permalink for comment 545892
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Maybe a leftover from how MS forbid OEMs to customise Windows images too much? (IIRC, in the first half of the 90s some PCs even shipped with OEM-specific shell replacements) To maintain consistent trade dress of Windows?
Though that still could be forbidden to OEMs while leaving the option open by default to users... OTOH, MS didn't try very hard to block it.