Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 18th Dec 2012 00:03 UTC
Permalink for comment 545947
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-03-26
I don't follow that statement. The WINE work around was officially published by Netflix and the reason they use Silverlight is because MPAA demanded it.
Those are two unrelated points.
Yeah Borland were struggling at that point, but that doesn't mean that the languages themselves were bad; just that Borland's IDEs were sub-par. Given my point was about the language and run time environments used by MS, it's somewhat moot how good or bad Borlands IDE was. Though let's be honest, even as late as then, Borland were only sub-par to Visual Studio.
I was talking about earlier versions of IE when I mentioned that.
Microsoft is only guilty of virtually abandoning IE until Vista was released. That's five years.
I'd already covered that.
MS killed the competition by implementing their own 'standards' in the mid 90s. Then left the market to stagnate for so long that the standards IE6 conformed to were out of date.
News flash, all browsers have ridiculous quirks. IEs are just the most well known.
How about the 12 implementations of the Flexible Box module out there across all browsers. Is that adherence to standards?
I'd also raised those points as well. I'm not by any means saying that other browsers are not guilty. But IE has been the worst offender - by far.