Linked by Kaj-de-Vos on Thu 20th Dec 2012 00:22 UTC
Permalink for comment 546171
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2012-12-22
I have no skin in this game, the last time I touched REBOL was years ago and I saw what was unique and interesting about it, but didn't end up caring much about it. I suppose I could say the same thing about Syllable for that matter, but that isn't my point.
Yes, I get that there is a high concordance between REBOL folk and Syllable folk, so it is good news for that community, but it isn't their news.
Surely the point of this story is that REBOL is being open sourced, and that is where the credit should go — to Carl Sassenrath and anyone else who was involved in open sourcing the language.
Who really cares if the Syllable folk predicted that it would be open sourced? And if if you look at the time between the prediction and it happening it wasn't an especially on the nose prediction either. Nor is that the relevant bit of the story, and yet it is presented as the lead.
Let us give credit where credit is due.