Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 18th Dec 2012 00:03 UTC
Permalink for comment 546215
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
It doesn't 'integrate nicely into the enterprise'. It's required for use by Exchange because it's impossible to get what people want out of Exchange any other way. That's it.
No one gives a shit about what happens on a Windows Phone quite frankly. I'm also afraid that the market share isn't there to push enough users into getting Outlook.com addresses.
Microsoft, and you, have this false sense of security that they are in a position of strength but in reality the only position of strength Microsoft have - the enterprise, i.e. Exchange lock-in - is in reality being surrounded by a far larger userbase.
No one cares. Microsoft knows what they can do if they want to fix it. Google could write something for Windows Phone I suppose but I doubt it's worth even a couple of hours of their time given the number of users it affects.
They will, once Exchange is effectively dead. Until then there are no such worries.