Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 27th Dec 2012 10:19 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Permalink for comment 546424
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/14/13 18:22 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-11-25
I don't think thinking logically is as fundamental to programming as it is thinking algorithmically. I've known many intelligent people, much more intelligent than me. But they can't program for shit. Logic is a red herring in programming and is really only a problem "in the small". Programming happens "in the large".
Then, if this particular art is lost on the intelligent, and requires more algorithmic thinking, how is that to come about?
More importantly, how do you make people actually *want* to program?
Why is it that most are happy to use computers for leisure, but are repulsed by the notion of understanding them more deeply?
Just like the other sciences, there seems to be a significant desire to avoid anything to do with actual analytical thinking.