Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 27th Dec 2012 10:19 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Permalink for comment 546428
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-03-30
Programming for all is a good concept. Inclusion is good, exclusion is bad.
If you want to talk about the future, talk about whether the march of great mature open source software will kill the need for employing so many programmers. If that happens, what next? When good software is unchanging and ubiquitous like the microwaves and toaster oven designs that seem unchanged in ten years, will the new goal of programming be... to make programming different so new types of people can participate? Will everyone use the same twitter client for 50 years like they and their parents ate Cheerios? Or will it be like fashion, and the next great thing for the individual isn't just done by a professional somewhere, but also by little girls after Christmas, thanks to the bedazzler or nail polish patterns someone kindly invented so those other than the professionals could participate in creation too?
Just sayin