Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 27th Dec 2012 15:50 UTC
Permalink for comment 546439
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-07-14
It has to be a joke. Either that or Apple has lost their minds. It would be a nearly useless gadget with a hefty price. What market is there for such a device? No serious watch collector or buyer will want such a device. It's not the Apple logo or digital technology that drives watches. Especially not one made in China. Your average teen crowd wouldn't want one. They don't want to wear a watch, regardless of what it does. And 1.5" screen? It is going to be clunky at best. Especially when it comes to women's watches.
ITO-coated glass? Lame. Sapphire is where it's at. Even touch sapphire.
Edited 2012-12-27 16:48 UTC