Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 3rd Jan 2013 21:23 UTC, submitted by Adurbe
Permalink for comment 547224
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-06-30
Re: "unity bashing"
Unity isn't a bad idea, it is just poorly executed. For two releases it was an unstable and slow mess unsuitable for a production use. Now, when most issues have been ironed out, it is all the minor quirks and lack of configurability that come and bite you. Having said that, Unity has all the basic desktop features and I could imagine myself using Unity, which is a lot more than I could say about Gnome Shell.
As for the number of users, I am using Xfce on my laptop yet it still presents itself as a plain Ubuntu installation. I guess that will be the case for all Ubuntu (not just Unity) users unless they have explicitly installed a Xubuntu, Kubuntu or Lubuntu version.