
Lead developer for Compiz, Sam Spilsbury, says
he sees little need to develop Compiz for Wayland due to the increasing fragmentation of the Linux ecosystem. Spilsbury writes "What does compiz actually provide to users of these systems? [...] None of this functionality that user wants really depends on our compositing engine. There's nothing so special about our compositing engine that gives it a reason to exist [...] This is the real practical toll of fragmentation amongst the Linux ecosystem. It's not just that there are multiple implementations of the wheel. There are multiple implementations of entire cars which do almost the same thing, but a little different from everyone else. Some say this is the free software's greatest strength. Now that I know the personal and technical toll of fragmentation, I see it as its greatest weakness."
Member since:
2011-02-11
Did you read the article?
Someone who makes this comparison in this context has absolutely zero idea why Wayland was written in the first place and how it differentiates from X11.
Wayland is a complete NEW design, porting Compiz to X11 would not only mean a lot work but it's also completely pointless. "
That was his point..