Linked by the_randymon on Wed 9th Jan 2013 00:48 UTC
X11, Window Managers Lead developer for Compiz, Sam Spilsbury, says he sees little need to develop Compiz for Wayland due to the increasing fragmentation of the Linux ecosystem. Spilsbury writes "What does compiz actually provide to users of these systems? [...] None of this functionality that user wants really depends on our compositing engine. There's nothing so special about our compositing engine that gives it a reason to exist [...] This is the real practical toll of fragmentation amongst the Linux ecosystem. It's not just that there are multiple implementations of the wheel. There are multiple implementations of entire cars which do almost the same thing, but a little different from everyone else. Some say this is the free software's greatest strength. Now that I know the personal and technical toll of fragmentation, I see it as its greatest weakness."
Permalink for comment 547946
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: What an utter non-sense
by toast88 on Wed 9th Jan 2013 14:10 UTC in reply to "RE: What an utter non-sense"
Member since:

As for your "Wayland is better than X" message, this depends on the situation, for network transparency Wayland will use more bandwith than X (not a big issue since you can use X with XWayland).

Correct. Wayland will work - more or less - exactly like Quartz on MacOS X. To run X11 applications, you start XWayland while you run XQuartz on MacOS X.



Edited 2013-01-09 14:10 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3