Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 9th Jan 2013 22:28 UTC
Permalink for comment 548071
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-08-18
Shatter-proofing a phone doesn't require a flexible screen, it requires a screen that doesn't shatter. We have plenty of shatter proof clear surfaces to choose from, but none of them are as scratch resistant as the shatter prone materials we currently use.
Flexible materials also don't strike me as particularly sturdy, either. It seems they'd be subject to repeated varied stress that non flexible displays aren't.
Of course there are degrees of flexibility, so maybe Thom and everyone else in the world is just thinking of a device that would bend slightly under extreme stress, instead of a screen that can be rolled up like an old school map?
All you have to do is look at power cords of AC wall adapters for things like laptops to see what the ultimate fate of flexible displays will be.
How many of them have broken exactly at the where the stress-relief part of cord joins the rest of the cord?