Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 10th Jan 2013 17:10 UTC
Permalink for comment 548214
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-29
You're looking at things the wrong way. You will have quarters where you face a dip, and others where you increase. Overall, Nokia has grown sequentially more than they have lost.
Its easy to mess with percentages if you try hard enough. I can say that Windows Phones are selling 500% more this holiday season than last holiday season.
While a positive indicator, and in your case, a negative indicator (their one quarter of a slow down), there are lingering questions over magnitude, in this case, a dip of about a million devices.
A set back? Sure, but there will be more, and in addition, there will be more positive news like today's news in Nokia's future.
And this is my own analysis of Nokia's numbers, not marketing spin. If they're wrong on their own, then you're free to say that, but saying that I'm just playing lip service to Nokia is disingenuous and gets in the way of a sensible discussion.