Linked by MOS6510 on Thu 10th Jan 2013 23:25 UTC
General Development "For years I've tried my damnedest to get away from C. Too simple, too many details to manage, too old and crufty, too low level. I've had intense and torrid love affairs with Java, C++, and Erlang. I've built things I'm proud of with all of them, and yet each has broken my heart. They've made promises they couldn't keep, created cultures that focus on the wrong things, and made devastating tradeoffs that eventually make you suffer painfully. And I keep crawling back to C."
Permalink for comment 548317
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: spot on
by bram on Fri 11th Jan 2013 05:13 UTC in reply to "RE: spot on"
bram
Member since:
2009-04-03

I have found Noel Llopis' Data-oriented design paper to be an eye opener. http://gamesfromwithin.com/data-oriented-design

With OO, it is easy to end up with a menagerie of objects all referring to each other with deep complexities. With data oriented design you tend to end up with flatter architectures and fewer dependencies.

I'm a game programmer, and I like his advice on how you could code most of your game engine subsystems as you would code your particle system.

With C, I feel more easily guided to data oriented, structures-of-arrays, instead of the OO and arrays of structures/objects.

Reply Parent Score: 4