Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 12th Jan 2013 22:53 UTC
Permalink for comment 548814
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-09-21
Why the artificial limit? Cause they try to push .NET in? As of today win32 apps are portable and there exist many native applications running on win32 and OSX/Linux. Microsoft's .NET is a patent mine-field unlike win32 and the posix-compatibility offered there. Microsoft actively controls and protected the .NET story. If they are able to move there ecosystem over they have strong ways to fight off competition. The whole .NET stack is a vendor lockin. That's why they tried hard to push it into the internet with Silverlight and later, once that failed, onto there ISV's. Good this failed too.
Edited 2013-01-15 07:58 UTC