Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 12th Jan 2013 22:53 UTC
Permalink for comment 548893
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-12-05
Now you're just trying to come up with lame excuses to run the risk of damaging a phone, in an effort to make it seem like theft, loss or physical damage are more likely to happen. Sorry, but I'm not buying it. Not when the act of doing it alone raises the chances of... well, an unsuccessful jailbreak.
Something tells me that if more people were adventurous and rooted/modded their phones, then a higher percentage would be damaged in the process. As it stands, very few people do it--and even then I doubt that any company would tally up and publicly release statistics on the percentage of their products sold that were reported or found to be tampered with and damaged in the process.
Also, 99.5% of the time my phone is not in use while I'm away from home, it is in my case attached to my pants or belt, concealed by my shirt. So while the chance of loss in some way can never be lowered to 0%, I am pretty damn confident in my capability to protect my belongings. To those many people who easily lose their things or get them stolen, well, it must suck. But I have never been one of them.
Maybe I am one of only a select few people who actually looks out for their possessions.
Edited 2013-01-15 19:06 UTC