Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 14th Jan 2013 22:11 UTC
In the News "Apparently, executives at CBS learned that the Hopper would win 'Best of Show' prior to the announcement. Before the winner was unveiled, CBS Interactive News senior-vice president and General Manager Mark Larkin informed CNET's staff that the Hopper could not take the top award. The Hopper would have to be removed from consideration, and the editorial team had to re-vote and pick a new winner from the remaining choices. Sources say that Larkin was distraught while delivering the news - at one point in tears - as he told the team that he had fought CBS executives who had made the decision." And this is why media owned by larger media conglomerates (or by large companies in general) should always be treated with a certain amount of scepticism. This may be an open and shut case, but more subtle interference can be felt every single day as you read the media.
Permalink for comment 548894
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
umccullough
Member since:
2006-01-26

I'm not saying I agree with them, I'm trying to point the legal reason behind it.


Ironically, by doing this, they *may* have just caused themselves another legal disaster:

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130114/19332021673/cbss-censorsh...

Edit: left out the word "may", which I intended to be in my statement ;)

Edited 2013-01-15 19:02 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2