Linked by the_randymon on Thu 17th Jan 2013 22:19 UTC
Permalink for comment 549204
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-16
The article seems to imply that having choice in Linux is a bad thing. I couldn't disagree more. I think it's great that multiple DEs exist and I don't even care that Cinnamon has forked from Gnome 3.x, or that MATE has forked from the reliable Gnome 2.x, etc. All I care about is that MY desktop choice (KDE) works well and allows me to be productive. That it does with aplomb. While ordinary computer users might want a unified desktop experience such as Mac OS-X or hand-holding while they figure out how to use their OS, I personally can figure out how to make things work my way myself. Windows limits that choice IMHO; Linux does not. To each his own. Long live Linux and long live the freedom to choose!
Edited 2013-01-18 00:16 UTC