Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 20th Jan 2013 23:42 UTC
Permalink for comment 549871
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2012-03-14
Really?
That's a completely new requirement for the definition of a window that you just came up with there.
Arbitrary bullshit, I'd sday, to make it seem as if the jump from desktop to smartphone/tablet is more significant a paradigm shift than it really is. Kind of like how people claim that using a finger instead of a mouse substantially alters the interface paradigm.
Nice marketing talk, but nonsense when you look at the science and definitions. "
Seriously?! it's right there in the wikipedia article, you yourself linked to!:
yes, if a window is maximized and i don't have any control over it, then it stops to be a WIMP interface and it just becomes a GUI. You see it all the time on electronic kiosks that are set up by companies or the state, to provide access to some sort of information. At that moment, since i can't just go hit the minize button, it becomes a GUI and not a WIMP. WIMP envolves mutiple Windows observable and actionable at the the same time. Why is that so hard for you to understand!? if it's just a GUI fullscreen it's not WIMP. So, apart from the touchwiz hack and the windows8 80/20 split, no present phone OS can be considered WIMP.
[And since when are we using wikipedia articles as definitions?...]