Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 21st Jan 2013 21:17 UTC
Permalink for comment 549919
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-03-17
So? Everything in business is politics; the main goal of a publicly traded corporation is to make a profit thus their actions will represent that goal. Google does not want to pay for a volume license, since they have to eat the costs for their non-paying (free) users. And Microsoft does not want to make EAS an open and free technology, since they make a pretty penny off it.
Again, if EAS is such a superior technology this is great news for Microsoft, since they have a clear value proposition for their mobile OS offerings over android.