Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 22nd Jan 2013 21:28 UTC, submitted by lemur2
Permalink for comment 549964
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-07-15
It's incredible how much some Linux lovers will try to fudge any number they can. First it was "desktop Linux," and when those of us point out that desktop Linux will go nowhere, they suddenly want to move it to "Linux" in general regardless of the market. Look, I know this guy loves Linux (any comments on here will tell you that). But, and this goes for all Linux fans out there, you do yourselves no favors by fudging the numbers in this way and, in fact, you appear quite dishonest when doing so. By your logic, I can prove that Windows is the most dominant player in the marketplace as well. For once I agree with Nelson (and that doesn't happen often) that a statistic such as this is meaningless and removes all context. Hell, by this logic I could also prove that OS/2 has a decent market penetration due to its presence on a good number of ATMs and other kiosks. I won't, because doing so is dishonest in intent if not in fact, but I could easily slant the numbers that way.