Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 22nd Jan 2013 21:28 UTC, submitted by lemur2
Linux "If you consider NetApplications' data set, then Linux owns only about 1 percent of the desktop OS market and Windows has almost 92 percent. But if you consider all computing platforms, including mobile, than Windows has only 20 percent and Linux has 42 percent - and that would be in the form of Google's Android alone." No more or less legitimate than claiming Windows owns 92% of the market. It's all a matter of perspective.
Permalink for comment 549971
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Marketshare
by WorknMan on Wed 23rd Jan 2013 03:17 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: Marketshare"
WorknMan
Member since:
2005-11-13

here are indeed a wider variety of desktop applications on other platforms, but they are not any better.


Of course they are. If you go and look at websites sporting Linux alternatives for commercial software, they are mostly inferior knock-offs of their commercial counterparts. This, of course, isn't ALWAYS the case, but is so the majority of the time.

Installing "crapware" is normally a way that OEMs use to offset the cost of Microsoft software they install on machines


How do you explain then the crapware on Android devices (and seeming lack of it on Windows Phone)? I know a lot of people blame carriers for this, but even wifi-only tablets like the Asus Transformer models come with it as well.

In other words, crapware is not strictly the domain of Windows. It is also possible to get Windows machines without crapware if you shop around (Including Microsoft stores). It's not like crapware comes preinstalled on a vanilla Windows disc, Metro on Windows 8 not withstanding ;)

Edited 2013-01-23 03:24 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 4