Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 22nd Jan 2013 21:28 UTC, submitted by lemur2
Permalink for comment 550033
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
You wipe the OS and then fully re-install it every 6 months and deliberately avoid in-system upgrading? Do you realize how much that sounds like a negative comment, with even you not trusting the system enough to just get by with in-system upgrades? I mean, OF COURSE it works if you wipe the OS and then install a new one! "
It isn't a new OS, it is the same OS, updated. Since I replace the older version by booting from a LiveCD of the newer version, I effectively pre-test the newer version before I commit to it. It costs nothing to move to an updated version of the OS, and it is more than twice as quick to re-format the OS root partition and install all updated files (takes only about twenty minutes in total) than it is to remove and replace most of the files file-by-file.
You are simply too mired in Windows-think to appreciate this. Even the most minor of updates to Windows are far more painful than a complete re-install of my desktop Linux distribution and all associated applications that I use. Finally, since as you say "of course it works" ... then please explain to me exactly why I shouldn't use this reliable, quick and painless method? Hmmmm?
Edited 2013-01-23 11:49 UTC