Linked by kragil on Wed 23rd Jan 2013 20:26 UTC
Permalink for comment 550178
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-03-26
I said I don't like the syntax, but, looks more like Go is your pet project or you work at Google, because telling me to STFU in such aggressive way reflects that.
Oh yeah, and for your information, I've tried Go already, and that's why I concluded that the Syntax sucks monkey balls IMHO.
I don't work for Google and was only aggressive because you gave the impression you hadn't used it. If you had then I genuinely apologise.
Personally I love the C syntax and use to love Pascal before I got into C derived languages. Go, for me, is an elegant marriage of the two. However we're talking about personal preferences so I can sympathise with those who don't prefer it.
You still didn't answer my earlier question though. You gave an example of a function with complicated types (akin to C++) and said other languages solved that problem. Which languages and how?