Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 22nd Jan 2013 21:28 UTC, submitted by lemur2
Permalink for comment 550308
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-08-21
What are you saying? That KDE- and DigiKam-developers are incompetent and therefore can't get DigiKam working properly? I'd say that's quite an insult. I have no idea why you'd think it'd be fun. Personally I trust their word when they say it works.
WTH? If you didn't try to twist my words, you'd know I'm saying precisely what I'm saying and NOT what you're making me say.
It's as simple as this. There's no other freaking application that crashes at startup _both_ on my Win 7 (using digikam-installer) PC _and_ on my Snow Leopard iMac (installing from MacPorts) like digiKam does. I love digiKam and would like to use it, but I cannot do that on my computers. I currently can't use Linux because I'm doing a lot of [pretty advanced] CAD work.
Also, it works perfectly well under 64-bit Windows 7, with absolutely NO issues:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/11811685/digikam1.jpg
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/11811685/digikam2.jpg
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/11811685/digikam3.jpg
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/11811685/digikam4.jpg
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/11811685/digikam5.jpg
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/11811685/digikam6.jpg
Glad it works for you. It does not on my computers. Even after deleting all old db's and leftovers. Is it enough?
Sorry for not making my point clearer - I was just saying that some applications offer a much more streamlined experience (wrt both installation and use) on Linux than on other, closed OSs. It might be like that because Qt + KDE libraries + digiKam make for a very complex setup. I don't know. I'm not really a novice and have some experience dating back to pkgsrc on NetBSD 1.6, so I've got some (very) basic skills.
I still can't get what qualifies my post as an insult to Digikam developers. You may need to chill out.