Linked by Howard Fosdick on Thu 24th Jan 2013 10:12 UTC
Internet & Networking In the past, OS News has discussed how U.S. broadband access lags many other countries in terms of cost, speed, and availability. Now, this detailed report from the New America Foundation tells why. It all comes down to a lack of competition among the carriers, which can be traced back to the days when cable companies were granted local monopolies. The report argues that " caps... are hardly a necessity. Rather, they are motivated by a desire to further increase revenues from existing subscribers and protect legacy services such as cable television from competing Internet services." The report's conclusion: don't expect improvements without legislative action.
Permalink for comment 550351
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Well....
by Laurence on Thu 24th Jan 2013 14:05 UTC in reply to "Well...."
Member since:

Cable (Virgin Media): 110Mbs (advertised as 100Mb)
BT Infinity: 76Mbs

Both of those are just downstream speeds (I *think* VM offer 10Mb upstream. BT offer 19Mbs).

Neither providers supply end-to-end fibre (well, not in the context of home broadband. At work we have a couple of GbE fibre links provided by BT).

BT Infinity is fibre to the cabinet (FTTC) - so the street and door are all copper. VM are -IIRC- fibre to the street, so from the street to the door is copper.

It's also worth mentioning that BT have been rolling out ADSL2+ to a number of towns. Which sees speeds increased from theoretical max of 8Mb to 24Mb. These speeds theoretical maximums aren't fully achievable though: line noise, other subscribers, etc. But you can still get fairly decent performance if you're lucky.

Edited 2013-01-24 14:09 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 4