Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 25th Jan 2013 14:20 UTC
Permalink for comment 550560
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-29
Again, if I were talking about it from that point of view he might have a valid comparison (Even then he wouldn't, because P4S was a dead proposition by the time Zune came out. No one was taking it seriously).
The Surface Phone is at this point an unconfirmed rumor. It remain to be seen what Microsoft will do there, but I have reservations. I don't think Windows Phone has a hardware issue. OEMs produce for the most part superb phones.
Very different from say, the PC OEM market.
I doubt Microsoft shields there partners. Specially not if they are of very less value for them any longer. The Apple vs Samsung case was about rounded corners, hardware. Unrelated to Microsoft's software on say Lumia.
You shouldn't doubt. Microsoft has been extensively indemnifying OEMs for a very, very long time.
Microsoft and Apple have agreements in place already. Apple wont sue Microsoft just like they wont sue Nokia. They'd get beat back into oblivion with a pretty powerful bunch of patent (both software and hardware in Nokia's case.)