Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 25th Jan 2013 14:20 UTC
Permalink for comment 550588
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-06-29
You don't even have to look at any of the fancier numbers to see that Nokia isn't doing well, despite Nelson's attempts at making it seem so. You only have to look at three numbers.
Nokia sold 4.9 million Lumias in Q4 2012, which is way up from the 2.9 million in Q3 2012. Sounds good right? Well, unless you look at Q2 2012, in which they sold 4.2 million Lumias.
So, despite the release of a brand new flagship device, AND several cheaper devices, AND a brand new operating system release backed by a huge marketing push from both Nokia and Microsoft, AND it being the holiday quarter, they only managed to do slightly better than a random Q2.
And this is what Nelson calls a turning point?
I'm sorry, but that's just batshit insane.