Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 29th Jan 2013 18:47 UTC
Permalink for comment 550779
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-10-23
Microsoft obviously hasn't got any sort of culture of looking out for disc space. Until Windows 7 they didn't seem to give a damn about memory and processor resources either. The Vista fiasco changed that; so perhaps the focus on mobile and the disc-austerity that comes with that will force them to do the same after Windows 8.
They really need that cultural change because, seriously, Windows 8 just doesn't have that much more functionality than a comparable OS* that fits on an 8GiB disc with space for a bucket load of packages/programmes.
*Hint: GNULinux, WinXP, Everything else.