Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 29th Jan 2013 18:47 UTC
Permalink for comment 550820
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-08
It's not the best showing, but I imagine a good chunk of that space is tied up in a few things:
There's probably a 4 or 8 gig page file.
There's probably a 3 or 4 gig hibernation file.
There's probably a sizable restore partition.
There's probably a sizable backup partition.
There's probably a sizable cache of drivers.
Those features are yours to give up with the proper configuration and cleansing of the drive but, such as they are, they cost disk space.
I hope and assume they've done due diligence in getting rid of anything frivolous that would not be easily removed by an end user, but this story isn't entirely new.
I recently bought a laptop and installed a 256GB SSD and 32 gigabytes of RAM -- Because the size of the page file and hibernation file are based on the amount of installed RAM, they were eating up near 50GB of disk space on their own. I disabled both, as SSD and gobs of RAM negate the need for either (I can sleep the machine, but not hibernate it).