Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 30th Jan 2013 00:38 UTC
Permalink for comment 550824
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-01-21
It was decided that having "kilo/giga/terabyte" and "kB/GB/TB" referring to powers of 1024 was at odds with the rest of the SI unit system.
Hence why what we both agree to be 'proper' gigabytes are now called "gibibytes" (giga binary bytes) and use the abbreviation "GiB".
When I first discovered that, I didn't like it but, after thinking about it for a while, I decided it makes more sense this way. (The whole point of SI prefixes like giga- is that they're consistent)
Also, while I doubt you'd want to, it means you can confuse or amuse your friends by speaking of kibigrams and kibimeters if you want. (The only use I can think of for those units would probably be for stating representational limitations of variables in game engines and other computer-based physical simulations in a concise, intuitive fashion)
Edited 2013-01-30 03:24 UTC